0.10/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.10/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mUZx93GZnV true 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:52:45 EDT 2022 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.33 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.12/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.12/0.34 % Running in HO mode 0.59/0.62 % Total configuration time : 828 0.59/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.59/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.69/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.69/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 1.07/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 1.07/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 1.07/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 1.14/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 1.14/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 1.14/0.83 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 1.16/0.91 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s 1.39/1.14 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s 15.94/3.57 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_old_s4.sh running for 30s 18.45/4.00 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 18.45/4.00 % running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.mUZx93GZnV/e_inputca5c0d --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p 18.45/4.00 % done 110 iterations in 3.196s 18.45/4.00 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 18.45/4.00 % SZS output start Refutation 18.45/4.00 thf(mor_type, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(fool_type, type, fool: $i > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(mforall_prop_type, type, mforall_prop: (($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(ws_type, type, ws: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(a_type, type, a: $i > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(mbox_type, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(mnot_type, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(b_type, type, b: $i > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(c_type, type, c: $i > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(mimplies_type, type, mimplies: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 18.45/4.00 thf(mvalid, axiom,(( mvalid ) = 18.45/4.00 (^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) )))). 18.45/4.00 thf('0', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( Phi @ W ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mvalid])). 18.45/4.00 thf('1', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 define([status(thm)])). 18.45/4.00 thf(mbox, axiom,(( mbox ) = 18.45/4.00 (^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( R @ W @ V ) ) ) )))). 18.45/4.00 thf('2', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mbox ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ![V:$i]: ( ( Phi @ V ) | ( ~( R @ W @ V ) ) ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mbox])). 18.45/4.00 thf('3', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mbox ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( V_2 @ X4 ) | ( ~( V_1 @ V_3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 define([status(thm)])). 18.45/4.00 thf(mimplies, axiom,(( mimplies ) = 18.45/4.00 (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ Phi ) @ Psi )))). 18.45/4.00 thf(mor, axiom,(( mor ) = 18.45/4.00 (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ( Phi @ W ) | ( Psi @ W ) )))). 18.45/4.00 thf('4', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mor ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ( Phi @ W ) | ( Psi @ W ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mor])). 18.45/4.00 thf('5', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mor ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) | ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 define([status(thm)])). 18.45/4.00 thf(mnot, axiom,(( mnot ) = (^[Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ~( Phi @ W ) )))). 18.45/4.00 thf('6', plain, (( mnot ) = ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),W:$i]: ( ~( Phi @ W ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mnot])). 18.45/4.00 thf('7', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mnot ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:$i]: ( ~( V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 define([status(thm)])). 18.45/4.00 thf('8', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mimplies ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o ),Psi:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ Phi ) @ Psi ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mimplies, '5', '7'])). 18.45/4.00 thf('9', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mimplies ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ V_1 ) @ V_2 ) )), 18.45/4.00 define([status(thm)])). 18.45/4.00 thf(axiom_3_c_a, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (mvalid @ 18.45/4.00 ( mbox @ 18.45/4.00 fool @ 18.45/4.00 ( mimplies @ 18.45/4.00 ( mnot @ ( ws @ c ) ) @ ( mbox @ a @ ( mnot @ ( ws @ c ) ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_0, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( ~( fool @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ![X8:$i]: ( ( ~( a @ X6 @ X8 ) ) | ( ~( ws @ c @ X8 ) ) ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ws @ c @ X6 ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (fool @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (a @ Y1 @ Y2))) | 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (ws @ c @ Y2)))))))) | 18.45/4.00 (ws @ c @ Y1)))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 18.45/4.00 thf(conj, conjecture, (mvalid @ ( mbox @ c @ ( ws @ c ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_1, conjecture, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: ( ( ~( c @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | ( ws @ c @ X6 ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, 18.45/4.00 (~( ![X4:$i,X6:$i]: ( ( ~( c @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | ( ws @ c @ X6 ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, 18.45/4.00 (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (c @ Y0 @ Y1))) | (ws @ c @ Y1)))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 18.45/4.00 thf(mforall_prop, axiom,(( mforall_prop ) = 18.45/4.00 (^[Phi:( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ),W:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ![P:( $i > $o )]: ( Phi @ P @ W ) )))). 18.45/4.00 thf('10', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mforall_prop ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[Phi:( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ),W:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ![P:( $i > $o )]: ( Phi @ P @ W ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mforall_prop])). 18.45/4.00 thf('11', plain, 18.45/4.00 (( mforall_prop ) = 18.45/4.00 ( ^[V_1:( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ),V_2:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ![X4:( $i > $o )]: ( V_1 @ X4 @ V_2 ) ) )), 18.45/4.00 define([status(thm)])). 18.45/4.00 thf(i_axiom_for_fool_c, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (mvalid @ 18.45/4.00 ( mforall_prop @ 18.45/4.00 ( ^[Phi:( $i > $o )]: 18.45/4.00 ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ fool @ Phi ) @ ( mbox @ c @ Phi ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_3, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:( $i > $o )]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( ![X10:$i]: ( ( ~( c @ X4 @ X10 ) ) | ( X6 @ X10 ) ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ~( ![X8:$i]: ( ( ~( fool @ X4 @ X8 ) ) | ( X6 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i > $o]: 18.45/4.00 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (c @ Y0 @ Y2))) | 18.45/4.00 (Y1 @ Y2)))))) | 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (fool @ Y0 @ Y2))) | 18.45/4.00 (Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])). 18.45/4.00 thf(axiom_4, axiom, (mvalid @ ( mnot @ ( mbox @ a @ ( ws @ a ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_4, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i]: ( ~( ![X6:$i]: ( ( ~( a @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | ( ws @ a @ X6 ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (a @ Y0 @ Y1))) | (ws @ a @ 18.45/4.00 Y1)))))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])). 18.45/4.00 thf(axiom_3_c_b, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (mvalid @ 18.45/4.00 ( mbox @ 18.45/4.00 fool @ 18.45/4.00 ( mimplies @ 18.45/4.00 ( mnot @ ( ws @ c ) ) @ ( mbox @ b @ ( mnot @ ( ws @ c ) ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_5, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( ~( fool @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ![X8:$i]: ( ( ~( b @ X6 @ X8 ) ) | ( ~( ws @ c @ X8 ) ) ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ws @ c @ X6 ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (fool @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (b @ Y1 @ Y2))) | 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (ws @ c @ Y2)))))))) | 18.45/4.00 (ws @ c @ Y1)))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_5])). 18.45/4.00 thf(axiom_3_a_b, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (mvalid @ 18.45/4.00 ( mbox @ 18.45/4.00 fool @ 18.45/4.00 ( mimplies @ 18.45/4.00 ( mnot @ ( ws @ a ) ) @ ( mbox @ b @ ( mnot @ ( ws @ a ) ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_6, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( ~( fool @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ![X8:$i]: ( ( ~( b @ X6 @ X8 ) ) | ( ~( ws @ a @ X8 ) ) ) ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ws @ a @ X6 ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (fool @ Y0 @ Y1))) | 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (b @ Y1 @ Y2))) | 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (ws @ a @ Y2)))))))) | 18.45/4.00 (ws @ a @ Y1)))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_6])). 18.45/4.00 thf(axiom_5, axiom, (mvalid @ ( mnot @ ( mbox @ b @ ( ws @ b ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_7, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i]: ( ~( ![X6:$i]: ( ( ~( b @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | ( ws @ b @ X6 ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (b @ Y0 @ Y1))) | (ws @ b @ 18.45/4.00 Y1)))))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_7])). 18.45/4.00 thf(axiom_1, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (mvalid @ 18.45/4.00 ( mbox @ fool @ ( mor @ ( ws @ a ) @ ( mor @ ( ws @ b ) @ ( ws @ c ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_8, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( ~( fool @ X4 @ X6 ) ) | ( ws @ c @ X6 ) | ( ws @ b @ X6 ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ws @ a @ X6 ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (fool @ Y0 @ Y1))) | (ws @ c @ Y1) | 18.45/4.00 (ws @ b @ Y1) | (ws @ a @ Y1)))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_8])). 18.45/4.00 thf(t_axiom_for_fool, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (mvalid @ 18.45/4.00 ( mforall_prop @ 18.45/4.00 ( ^[A:( $i > $o )]: ( mimplies @ ( mbox @ fool @ A ) @ A ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zf_stmt_9, axiom, 18.45/4.00 (![X4:$i,X6:( $i > $o )]: 18.45/4.00 ( ( X6 @ X4 ) | 18.45/4.00 ( ~( ![X8:$i]: ( ( ~( fool @ X4 @ X8 ) ) | ( X6 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ))). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, 18.45/4.00 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i > $o]: 18.45/4.00 (((Y1 @ Y0) | 18.45/4.00 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]: 18.45/4.00 (((((~) @ (fool @ Y0 @ Y2))) | 18.45/4.00 (Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))))))), 18.45/4.00 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_9])). 18.45/4.00 thf(zip_derived_cl2152, plain, ($false), 18.45/4.00 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 18.45/4.00 [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl3, 18.45/4.00 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl28, 18.45/4.00 zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl18])). 18.45/4.00 18.45/4.00 % SZS output end Refutation 18.45/4.00 18.45/4.00 18.45/4.00 % Terminating... 19.11/4.11 % Runner terminated. 19.11/4.12 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 19.11/4.12 EOF